A few years back, a six-time founder named Chris Howard pulled off a small piece of psychological theatre that ended in a £50,000 cheque.

He'd done his homework on an investor - found out which coffee shop they liked, even worked out exactly which coffee they tended to order. He arranged the meeting at that coffee shop, walked in early, and ordered their drink before they arrived. When the investor sat down, he turned to them casually and said, "This is on me - what would you like?" The investor named the same coffee already sitting in front of him.

"Oh, that's great," he said. "We seem to like the same things."

The cheque cleared shortly after.

Now, before you cringe and close the tab - this isn't a story about manipulation. It's a story about a psychological force that's deciding which founders get funded right now, whether anyone wants to admit it or not. It's called the affinity bias, and if you're raising money, hiring, selling, or pitching anything to anyone, you are either using it or being beaten by people who are.

Let's break down what it actually is, why it's working against most founders by default, and how to use it without losing your soul.

See below to continue…

Our friend Cezary from OVHcloud is organising the OVHcloud Summit in London - a sharp afternoon of cloud & AI talks, good networking, and an awards ceremony. We'll be there, and we'd love for you to join us.

Cezary leads the OVHcloud Startup Program and can get you up to €100K in free cloud credits. He'll be there on the day - genuinely worth a chat if you haven't spoken to him yet.

Seats are limited: Grab your spot

Continue…

The short version: humans are wired to trust people who feel like "one of us". Same school. Same hometown. Same accent. Same coffee order. The brain takes these surface-level cues and uses them as a shortcut for "this person is safe, competent, and worth listening to" - long before any actual evidence has been presented.

When two people feel like they're from the same tribe, the listening person is roughly twice as likely to engage with what the speaker has to say. They're not consciously deciding to like them more. They just do.

This isn't fringe psychology. A landmark study by behavioural scientist Dr. William Maddux at INSEAD put MBA students into negotiation scenarios and instructed some of them to subtly mirror their counterparts' body language and verbal patterns. The mirroring group closed the deal 67% of the time. The control group? 12%. Same students, same task, same information - just a different level of unconscious rapport.

Other studies in restaurants have shown the same effect in miniature: waitresses who repeated their customers' orders verbatim (a form of verbal mirroring) received significantly larger tips than those who simply said "coming up." Customers who were complimented on their order choice tipped more too. Tiny signals of "we're alike" lead to disproportionate outcomes.

Now apply that to a pitch meeting.

Here's the uncomfortable part. Affinity bias is also the reason VC funding looks the way it does.

In the UK, less than 1p of every £1 of venture capital goes to all-female founder teams. 89p goes to all-male teams. And 87% of decision-makers in UK VC firms are male. As one VC put it bluntly: "Warm introductions are, by definition, more likely to be made to male partners, who may find it easier to connect with businesses founded by people like them - otherwise known as affinity bias."

This is the same effect that drives people from a particular university to back alumni from the same university. It's why so many funded founders look like the partners of the firms backing them. It's not (usually) conscious discrimination. It's pattern matching dressed up as judgement, and it shapes which decks get opened, which calls get returned, and which companies get cheques.

The takeaway isn't to be angry about it. The takeaway is to understand it, because once you do, you can actually do something about it.

Chris Howard makes one really important distinction: the person you're targeting is rarely the first person who'll open your deck. At a VC firm, that's usually the associate. In a sales pipeline, it's the SDR or the gatekeeper. In a hiring funnel, it's the recruiter. So most founders are optimising for the wrong audience.

Here's how to apply this in practice.

1. Research the first reader, not the final decision-maker. Spend 30 minutes on LinkedIn before you send anything. Where did the associate go to university? Where did they work before? What conferences do they speak at? What's their background? You're looking for one or two genuine points of overlap.

2. Surface that overlap on slide 2. Don't bury it in a bio at the back. Chris recommends putting it on the team slide near the top of the deck. If you both went to the same university, make the logo bigger. If you both have a military background, lead with that. If you both worked at the same company once, name it. The goal is for the unconscious brain to register "one of us" before the conscious brain has even started reading the words.

3. In live pitches, open with shared ground. Stand-up comedians do this for a living. Watch any comic walk on stage - the first 30 seconds is almost always a joke about the city, the venue, or something the audience has in common. They're not just warming the room up. They're activating affinity bias before they tell a single real joke. You can do the same in a pitch: acknowledge the shared context, the shared challenge, the shared frustration. It's not flattery. It's tribal signalling.

4. Mirror, subtly. If your investor speaks slowly and deliberately, slow down. If they're casual and animated, loosen up. If they use specific terminology - "thesis", "conviction", "fund construction" - use it back to them. Mirroring isn't mimicry. It's matching energy and vocabulary so they unconsciously feel that you "get it".

Most founders only think about affinity bias in the context of fundraising. But it's running in the background of basically every important conversation you'll have this year.

Hiring. If you only interview people from your network, you'll end up with a team that looks like you, thinks like you, and shares all your blind spots. The cure isn't to ignore affinity - it's to actively widen the tribe you're recruiting from. Bring in people who feel "off-pattern" on purpose.

Sales. Every B2B sale is an affinity play. Buyers buy from sellers who feel familiar. If you're selling to engineers, hire engineers. If you're selling to teachers, your founder bio should feature your time as a teacher prominently. The same product pitched by the "right tribe" closes faster.

Co-founder relationships. The friend-from-uni co-founder trap is well documented. You feel aligned because you're alike - but alike doesn't mean complementary. Affinity is a useful starting condition for trust, but a terrible one for building a team that covers all the angles.

Customer development. When you interview users, they're more likely to give you honest feedback if you feel like one of them. This is why "go talk to your users" works so well for vertical founders and so badly for outsiders trying to enter a category cold.

Networking and community building. The fastest way to build a network is to find one shared identity and lead with it relentlessly. Every founder community that's grown fast in the last five years - from On Deck to South Park Commons to female-founder networks like AllBright - has affinity at the core of its growth strategy.

Worth saying clearly: there's a difference between using affinity bias to get a fair hearing and using it to deceive someone into something against their interests. Ordering the same coffee as your investor isn't manipulation. Pretending to share values you don't actually hold is.

The honest use of this stuff is to lower the unfair barriers that affinity bias creates - to get into the room, to hold attention long enough for the substance to do the work, to be heard the way someone with the "right" accent or the "right" school would be heard by default.

You're not gaming the system. You're recognising that the system is already gamed, and refusing to keep losing to it.

Affinity bias is the most underrated psychological lever in the startup ecosystem. It's deciding which decks get opened, which meetings get booked, which hires get made, and which cheques get cut - and most founders are leaving it entirely to chance.

Twenty minutes of research before every important meeting. One slide change in your deck. A small adjustment to how you mirror the person opposite you. These are not big asks. But they could be the difference between the meeting that ends with "we'll think about it" and the one that ends with a cheque in your inbox.

Coffee optional. But honestly? Order the coffee.

✅ Know a founder gearing up to raise, hire, or pitch this year? Forward this their way. The sooner they understand how affinity bias is shaping every room they walk into, the better the cheques, hires, and customers they'll land.

(👉 Vote now — we’ll share the results in next week’s issue. All votes are anonymous.)

(Last week’s poll results)

All the UK’s best startup events in one place.

Access here and please share it with others.